О премии

Премия Фредерика Джексона Тернера (Frederick Jackson Turner Award) ежегодно вручается Организацией американских историков (the Organization of American Historians) автору первой научной книги, посвященной некоторым аспектам американской истории.

Правила и условия номинирования:
- подходящие по тематике книги должны быть опубликованы в течение календарного года, предшествующего тому, в котором присуждается награда;
- автор ранее не публиковал ни одной исторической книги;
- заявки на номинирование подаются издателями;
- допускаются соавторские работы, если ни один из авторов ранее не публиковал книг исторической тематики;
- авторы, которые ранее были соавторами книги по истории, не имеют права быть номинированными.

Жанр: История Страна: США Язык: Английский Первое вручение: 1959 г. Последнее вручение: 2023 г. Официальный сайт: https://www.oah.org/awards/book-awards/frederick-jackson-turner-award/

Номинации

Премия Фредерика Джексона Тернера
Frederick Jackson Turner Award
Почётное упоминание
Honorable Mention
Все победители

1 апреля 2023 г. — победители

Премия Фредерика Джексона Тернера
Necropolis: Disease, Power, and Capitalism in the Cotton Kingdom
Кэтрин Оливариус 0.0
Disease is thought to be a great leveler of humanity, but in antebellum New Orleans acquiring immunity from the scourge of yellow fever magnified the brutal inequities of slave-powered capitalism.



Antebellum New Orleans sat at the heart of America's slave and cotton kingdoms. It was also where yellow fever epidemics killed as many as 150,000 people during the nineteenth century. With little understanding of mosquito-borne viruses--and meager public health infrastructure--a person's only protection against the scourge was to "get acclimated" by surviving the disease. About half of those who contracted yellow fever died.

Repeated epidemics bolstered New Orleans's strict racial hierarchy by introducing another hierarchy, what Kathryn Olivarius terms "immunocapital." As this highly original analysis shows, white survivors could leverage their immunity as evidence that they had paid their biological dues and could then pursue economic and political advancement. For enslaved Blacks, the story was different. Immunity protected them from yellow fever, but as embodied capital, they saw the social and monetary value of their acclimation accrue to their white owners. Whereas immunity conferred opportunity and privilege on whites, it relegated enslaved people to the most grueling labor.

The question of good health--who has it, who doesn't, and why--is always in part political. Necropolis shows how powerful nineteenth-century white Orleanians--all allegedly immune--pushed this politics to the extreme. They constructed a society that capitalized mortal risk and equated perceived immunity with creditworthiness and reliability. Instead of trying to curb yellow fever through sanitation or quarantines, immune white Orleanians took advantage of the chaos disease caused. Immunological discrimination therefore became one more form of bias in a society premised on inequality, one more channel by which capital disciplined and divided the population.
Купить эту книгу
Показать всех победителей

Кураторы